Skip to main content
All guides

Separating substantive vendors

May 2026.

Processing lawfulness clarity

If privacy policy wording conflicts with heroic landing copy—that inconsistency deserves skepticism.

Retention must be enumerated

Transcripts versus aggregates versus diagnostic logs merit distinct TTLs.

Overclaim remediation

"Always detects grooming" promises require reproducible adjudicated evaluations—not vibes.

Ingestion envelopes

Offline-first coercion or burner ephemeral accounts dodge most technical surveillance eventually.

References to verify

Ask for privacy policy version dates, subprocessors list, and deletion SLAs in writing—not slide decks alone.

When vendors deflect

If answers stay vague after written requests, treat marketing claims as unverified.

References

Compare monitoring limits and regional law orientation.

Limitations

This checklist is educational—not due diligence on your behalf.